🔗 Share this article

Tomas Anez Dos Santos toiled in a tiny clearing far in the Peruvian rainforest when he heard footsteps drawing near through the dense forest.

He became aware that he had been encircled, and stood still.

“One was standing, pointing with an arrow,” he states. “And somehow he noticed I was here and I commenced to escape.”

He had come confronting members of the Mashco Piro. For decades, Tomas—who lives in the small village of Nueva Oceania—served as practically a local to these itinerant tribe, who avoid interaction with foreigners.

A new study from a rights organisation indicates there are a minimum of 196 termed “uncontacted groups” remaining in the world. This tribe is considered to be the largest. The study claims a significant portion of these groups might be wiped out within ten years if governments neglect to implement additional actions to defend them.

The report asserts the most significant dangers are from timber harvesting, digging or operations for crude. Isolated tribes are exceptionally susceptible to basic illness—as such, the report notes a risk is caused by exposure with religious missionaries and social media influencers seeking clicks.

In recent times, Mashco Piro people have been appearing to Nueva Oceania increasingly, according to locals.

The village is a angling village of a handful of clans, perched atop on the shores of the Tauhamanu River deep within the of Peru jungle, a ten-hour journey from the nearest settlement by canoe.

The area is not classified as a protected area for uncontacted groups, and timber firms function here.

Tomas says that, at times, the sound of heavy equipment can be detected around the clock, and the community are witnessing their woodland disrupted and devastated.

In Nueva Oceania, people say they are conflicted. They are afraid of the tribal weapons but they also have profound admiration for their “relatives” residing in the jungle and desire to defend them.

“Allow them to live according to their traditions, we are unable to change their way of life. For this reason we preserve our separation,” explains Tomas.

The people in Nueva Oceania are worried about the destruction to the community's way of life, the threat of violence and the possibility that deforestation crews might subject the Mashco Piro to sicknesses they have no resistance to.

While we were in the village, the tribe made themselves known again. Letitia Rodriguez Lopez, a young mother with a toddler daughter, was in the jungle picking produce when she detected them.

“There were calls, shouts from others, many of them. Like there were a large gathering shouting,” she shared with us.

It was the initial occasion she had come across the tribe and she fled. Subsequently, her thoughts was continually throbbing from terror.

“Because exist loggers and firms destroying the woodland they're running away, perhaps because of dread and they end up near us,” she explained. “We don't know how they might react with us. That is the thing that terrifies me.”

Two years ago, two loggers were confronted by the group while fishing. A single person was hit by an projectile to the stomach. He lived, but the other man was discovered lifeless days later with multiple puncture marks in his physique.

The Peruvian government follows a policy of avoiding interaction with secluded communities, establishing it as prohibited to commence interactions with them.

This approach began in Brazil after decades of campaigning by community representatives, who observed that initial exposure with secluded communities resulted to entire communities being wiped out by illness, hardship and starvation.

During the 1980s, when the Nahau people in Peru made initial contact with the broader society, a significant portion of their people perished within a few years. In the 1990s, the Muruhanua people faced the identical outcome.

“Isolated indigenous peoples are highly at risk—in terms of health, any interaction could transmit diseases, and even the most common illnesses might decimate them,” explains an advocate from a local advocacy organization. “Culturally too, any interaction or interference could be highly damaging to their existence and well-being as a society.”

For those living nearby of {